The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-1003•Moreton Rolleston, Jr v. HOMER HOLBROOK, Sheriff of Macon County, NC
02-1003Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 1, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1003
MORETON ROLLESTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HOMER HOLBROOK, Sheriff of Macon County, NC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-01-256-2)
Submitted: April 17, 2002 Decided: May 1, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Moreton Rolleston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. R. S. Jones, Jr., JONES,
KEY, MELVIN & PATTON, P.A., Franklin, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Moreton Rolleston, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for a temporary injunction, dismissing his
complaint in which he sought to enjoin the enforcement of a state
court judgment, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Rolleston v. Holbrook, No. CA-01-256-2
(W.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2001; Dec. 5, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.