The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-8127•Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr v. United States of America
01-8127Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8127
LAWRENCE MICHAEL HARRISON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL
BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CR-99-513-BR)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris
Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Harrison, No.
CR-99-513-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.