The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-8112•Hosam Mohammed Zakaria v. United States of America
01-8112Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8112
HOSAM MOHAMMED ZAKARIA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-181-A)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hosam Mohammed Zakaria, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hosam Mohammed Zakaria appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
order of the district court. Zakaria v. United States, No. CR-91-
181-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.