The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-8108•John Mock, a/k/a Eric Washington v. State of North Carolina
01-8108Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 14, 2002
Opinion withdrawn by court order
filed 5/14/02; another opinion
will issue at later date
-- 1 of 3 --
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8108
JOHN MOCK, a/k/a Eric Washington,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-786-5)
Submitted: March 12, 2002 Decided: May 9, 2002
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Mock, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
John Mock appeals from the district court’s order dismissing
sua sponte his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001) petition
as untimely. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Mock v. North Carolina, No.
CA-01-786-5 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.