Aaron Holsey v. WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner

01-8093Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 22, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8093
AARON HOLSEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
01-2558-JFM)
Submitted: April 30, 2002 Decided: May 22, 2002
Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Holsey appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his
motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning
of the district court. See Holsey v. Sondervan, No. CA-01-2558-JFM
(D. Md. Sept. 25, 2001; Oct. 9, 2001; filed Dec. 3, 2001, entered
Dec. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.