The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-8092•United States of America v. Jerry Sanders
01-8092Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 18, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8092
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JERRY SANDERS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-93-34-MU)
Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Sanders appeals the district court’s orders denying his
motion seeking to challenge his conviction and sentence pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) and denying as moot his motion for ruling
on his Rule 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Sanders, No. CR-93-34-MU (W.D.N.C. May 4, 2001;
Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.