The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-8079•United States of America v. Kermit C. Brown, a/k/a Brian Mackey, a/k/a Destruction, a/k/a Bear
01-8079Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 16, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8079
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KERMIT C. BROWN, a/k/a Brian Mackey, a/k/a
Destruction, a/k/a Bear,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CR-98-47, CA-01-774-2)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: April 16, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kermit C. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kermit C. Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Brown, Nos.
CR-98-47; CA-01-774-2 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 6, 2001, entered Nov. 7,
2001). We dispense with oral argument and deny Brown’s motion for
sentencing transcripts because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.