The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-8068•Dennis Stoneman v. Nurse Ransen
01-8068Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 28, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8068
DENNIS STONEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NURSE RANSEN; SERGEANT STOKES; MONIQUE
EPPERSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-01-557)
Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Stoneman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Stoneman appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) action without prejudice
for failure to pay a partial filing fee. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Stoneman v. Ransen, No. CA-01-557 (E.D. Va. Nov. 2,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.