United States of America v. Edward Allen Pineiro

01-8057Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8057
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EDWARD ALLEN PINEIRO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (CR-97-39, CA-00-341-7)
Submitted: May 9, 2002 Decided: May 29, 2002
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Allen Pineiro, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Allen Pineiro seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his
“Motion to include New ruling addressing breach of plea agreement
by non-fulfillment of promise.” Our review of this case reveals
that this claim previously was raised by Pineiro and rejected by
this court in review of Pineiro’s appeal of the denial of his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001), in United
States v. Pineiro, No. 01-6981 (4th Cir. Dec. 18, 2001)
(unpublished). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.