The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-8049•United States of America v. Jose Hernan Borda
01-8049Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8049
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOSE HERNAN BORDA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-95-267-AW, CA-00-1527-AW)
Submitted: April 9, 2002 Decided: May 29, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Hernan Borda, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jose Hernan Borda seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001), his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion as to that order, and his
motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Borda, Nos. CR-95-267-AW;
CA-00-1527-AW (D. Md. Aug. 28, Sept. 6, and Nov. 1, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.