The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-8022•Jerome Branch v. Ron Cherry
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8022
JEROME BRANCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RON CHERRY; LIEUTENANT JONES; P. A. SNOWDY;
NURSE BROWN; MS. TELINSKI, Head Nurse;
SARGEANT ADAMS; NURSE WHITESIDE; NURSE
GOLDSMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-407-2)
Submitted: March 6, 2002 Decided: March 18, 2002
Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Branch, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Branch appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. See Porter v. Nussle, U.S. , 2002 WL
261683 (Feb. 26, 2002) (No. 853); Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731
(2001). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Branch v. Lieutenant Jones, No. CA-01-407-2 (E.D. Va.
Nov. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.