The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-8008•United States of America v. Emmanuel Uzuegbunam
01-8008Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 15, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EMMANUEL UZUEGBUNAM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-96-43)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: March 15, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emmanuel Uzuegbunam, Appellant Pro Se. Paul J. McNulty, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Emmanuel Uzuegbunam appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we deny Uzuegbunam’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny
a certificate of appealability, and dismiss on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Uzuegbunam, No. CR-96-43 (E.D.
Va. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.