The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7982•United States of America v. Harold Alexandor Hawkins, Jr
01-7982Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7982
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HAROLD ALEXANDOR HAWKINS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CR-98-159)
Submitted: February 5, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Alexandor Hawkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Brien
Comey, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harold Alexandor Hawkins, Jr. seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hawkins, No. CR-
98-159 (E.D. Va. Oct. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.