The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7960•Occea Starke v. Avamark Refreshment Services
01-7960Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 18, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7960
OCCEA STARKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AVAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES; M. WADE, Sheriff
of Henrico County Jail; WAYNE HEAD, Kitchen
Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-687-2)
Submitted: February 28, 2002 Decided: March 18, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Occea Starke, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Occea Starke appeals the district court’s orders denying re-
lief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)
complaint and denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Starke v. Avamark Refreshment Servs., No.
CA-01-687-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2001; Nov. 15, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.