The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7920•Henry L. Aiken v. WILLIE WELDON, Warden
01-7920Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 28, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7920
HENRY L. AIKEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIE WELDON, Warden; FISITMOND SANDERS,
Captain; TIMOTHY CLARK, Lieutenant; JOHNNY
BUNCUMB, Sergeant; DAVID GADDIS, Corporal;
PIERR NEAL, Sergeant; VINCENT THURMAN,
Correctional Officer; GARY MANIGUALT,
Correctional Officer; CLASSY THOMPSON,
Corporal; LISA PARROTT, I.G.C.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-01-288-9-18RB)
Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry L. Aiken, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Joel Anderson,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Henry L. Aiken appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Aiken v. Weldon, No. CA-01-288-9-18RB (D.S.C. Sept. 27, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.