Jose A. Doyharzabal v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7900
JOSE A. DOYHARZABAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District
Judge. (CA-00-2995-7-24BG)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 22, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose A. Doyharzabal, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jose A. Doyharzabal appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Bureau of Prisons on his claims
filed under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552a (West 1996 & Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Doyharzabal v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No.
CA-00-2995-7-24BG (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2001). We grant Doyharzabal’s
motion for leave to amend his informal brief. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --