The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7875•Stanley A. Blakey v. OFFICER MCCUEN, Kitchen Officer
01-7875Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7875
STANLEY A. BLAKEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER MCCUEN, Kitchen Officer; MAJOR LYCETT;
LIEUTENANT MOORE, Head of discipline
committee,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-01-747-2)
Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 5, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley A. Blakey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stanley A. Blakey appeals the district court’s order dismiss-
ing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The dis-
trict court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies
under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 2001). Because Blakey did
not demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted ad-
ministrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the
court’s dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an
abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the district court’s
order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.