The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7870•Joseph Frederick Moore v. H. R. POWELL, Warden
01-7870Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 11, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7870
JOSEPH FREDERICK MOORE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
H. R. POWELL, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-97-595-3)
Submitted: February 13, 2002 Decided: March 11, 2002
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Frederick Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assis-
tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Frederick Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders (1) denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from
the judgment dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(West 1994 & Supp. 2001), as untimely; and (2) denying his motion
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. Moore v. Powell, No. CA-97-595-3
(E.D. Va. filed Apr. 30, 2001 & entered May 1, 2001; Oct. 5, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.