The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7839•Reginald Moffett v. SCOTT DODRILL, Warden
01-7839Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 22, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7839
REGINALD MOFFETT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SCOTT DODRILL, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-655-5-BR)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 22, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Moffett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Moffett appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and motion to
reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Moffett v. Dodrill, No.
CA-01-655-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 7, 2001 & entered Sept. 11,
2001; filed Sept. 27, 2001 & entered Sept. 28, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.