The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7826•Henry Perry-Bey v. Corporal Frock
01-7826Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 28, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7826
HENRY PERRY-BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CORPORAL FROCK; BARRY STANTON, Director; ABU
KALOKOH, Medical Director, Prince George’s
County Correctional Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
01-899-PJM)
Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Perry-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. William Antoine Snoddy,
Associate County Attorney, Sean Daniel Wallace, John Anthony
Bielec, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Philip
Melton Andrews, George Eugene Brown, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Henry Perry-Bey appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Perry-Bey v. Frock, No. CA-01-899-PJM (D.
Md. filed Oct. 16, 2001; entered Oct. 17, 2001). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.