United States of America v. Darryl Pernell Camps

01-7814Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7814
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DARRYL PERNELL CAMPS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-90-85, CA-01-374-2-MU)
Submitted: March 20, 2002 Decided: April 1, 2002
Before LUTTIG, WIDENER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Pernell Camps, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Timothy Calloway,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Pernell Camps appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001)
and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Camps, Nos. CR-90-85; CA-01-374-2-MU (W.D.N.C.
filed July 25, 2001, entered July 27, 2001; filed Aug. 15, 2001,
entered Aug. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.