The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7771•United States of America v. Robert Elton Stotts, a/k/a Sugarbear
01-7771Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7771
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT ELTON STOTTS, a/k/a Sugarbear,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CR-95-49)
Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 5, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Elton Stotts, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Elton Stotts appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000), and
his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Stotts, No. CR-95-49 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 5, 2001
& entered Sept. 6, 2001; filed Sept. 26, 2001 & entered Sept. 27,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.