The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7739•United States of America v. Richmond Wall, Iii
01-7739Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 25, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7739
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHMOND WALL, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CR-98-177-A)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 25, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Frederick Daum, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Justin
W. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richmond Wall seeks to appeal the district court’s order and
opinion denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Wall, No.
CR-98-177-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 7, 2001; entered Sept. 11, 2001).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.