Garfield William Holley v. CLARK R. FARMER, Sergeant

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7723
GARFIELD WILLIAM HOLLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CLARK R. FARMER, Sergeant; RICHARD A. YOUNG;
B. EDMONDS,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 01-7967
GARFIELD WILLIAM HOLLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CLARK R. FARMER, Sergeant; RICHARD A. YOUNG,
Regional Director; B. EDMONDS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-01-672-7, CA-01-610-1)

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 22, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Garfield William Holley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Garfield William Holley, a Virginia inmate, appeals the dis-
trict court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2001) complaints under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2001).
We have reviewed the records and find that the district court
committed no reversible error. Further, Holley is estopped from
raising the charge in his complaint regarding an alleged unlawful
interrogation of another inmate because this claim has already been
decided on the merits in previous litigation. Holley v. Baker, No.
00-6698 (4th Cir. Sept. 28, 2000) (unpublished), cert. denied,
U.S. , 121 S. Ct. 2561 (2001). Accordingly, we dismiss the ap-
peals on the reasoning of the district court. See Holley v. Farmer,
Nos. CA-01-672-7; CA-01-610-1 (W.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2001; filed Oct.
12, 2001, entered Oct. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --