Vincent Barr v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7708
VINCENT BARR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION,
PAROLE, AND PARDON SERVICES; CURTIS KEELS,
Agent of SCDPPPS; STEVEN BENJAMIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-01-3175-2-22)
Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 22, 2002
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Barr, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Barr appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint and
denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barr v. South
Carolina Dep’t of Probation, Parole & Pardon Servs., No. CA-01-
3175-2-22 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 12, 2001, entered Sept. 14, 2001; and
filed Feb. 7, 2002, entered Feb. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --