United States of America v. William Henry Potts

01-7658Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 29, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7658
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM HENRY POTTS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. William L. Osteen, District
Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-95-15-V)
Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Henry Potts, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Jack Higdon, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Henry Potts appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to dismiss indictment under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(2).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Potts, No. CR-95-15-V (W.D.N.C. Sept.
7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the district court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.