George Beesley Boyd v. J. Michael Stouffer

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7644
GEORGE BEESLEY BOYD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
J. MICHAEL STOUFFER; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge.
(CA-01-2564-S)
Submitted: February 12, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Beesley Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
George Beesley Boyd appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West
1994 & Supp. 2001), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
Boyd v. Stouffer, No. CA-01-2564-S (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2001; filed
Sept. 12, 2001 and entered Sept. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --