The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7633•William T. McGhee v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Incorporated
01-7633Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 8, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7633
WILLIAM T. MCGHEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES,
INCORPORATED; ERNEST FULLWOOD; PERRY MARTIN;
JERRY SPIVEY; NORA HARGROVE; FRANK DESILUA;
JACK POISSON; JAMES LLEWELYN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-583-5-BO)
Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 8, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William T. McGhee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William T. McGhee, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the dis-
trict court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2001).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McGhee v. North
Carolina Prisoner Legal Servs., Inc., No. CA-01-583-5-BO (E.D.N.C.
Aug. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.