The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7605•Jeffrey Dennard McNeair v. Lieutenant Truell
01-7605Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 31, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7605
JEFFREY DENNARD MCNEAIR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT TRUELL; CALVIN CANTEY; WALLACE
STONE; GRELL HEDGE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CALVIN CUNNINGTON,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-00-327-1)
Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 31, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Jeffrey Dennard McNeair, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Michael Cogdill,
WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina;
John Hamilton Watters, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh,
North Carolina; Joe Earl Biesecker, WILSON, BIESECKER, TRIPP &
SINK, Lexington, North Carolina; Margaret Shea Burnham, ADAMS,
KLEEMEIER, HAGAN, HANNAH & FOUTS, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Dennard McNeair appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) com-
plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See McNeair v. Truell, No. CA-00-327-1 (M.D.N.C.
Aug. 27, 2001). We grant McNeair’s motion for voluntary dismissal
of Appellee Calvin Cunnington. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.