Full text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7595
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
STEPHEN JAMES MILLS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CR-97-815)
Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 21, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen James Mills, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen James Mills appeals from the district court’s order
denying his Rule 60(b)(4) motion. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Mills, No. CR-97-815 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 27, 2001; entered
Aug. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
