The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7578•Tyrone Johnson v. United States of America
01-7578Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7578
TYRONE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MEDICAL FACILITY, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL IN-
STITUTION, BUTNER, N.C. (Med. High); WARDEN,
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, BUTNER, N.C.
(Med. High),
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-01-81-5-H)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 22, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Tyrone Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Johnson v. United States, No. CA-01-81-5-H
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.