The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7573•United States of America v. Ronald Timothy Stewart
01-7573Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7573
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALD TIMOTHY STEWART,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CR-93-41-F, CA-00-794-F)
Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 4, 2002
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Timothy Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Timothy Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Stewart’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Stewart, Nos. CR-93-41-F; CA-00-794-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 2001; Feb.
13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.