The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7567•Frederick D. Kyle v. E. L. PEARSON, Warden
01-7567Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7567
FREDERICK D. KYLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
E. L. PEARSON, Warden; JAMILA F. BURNEY,
Associate Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-01-360-3)
Submitted: April 19, 2002 Decided: June 3, 2002
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick D. Kyle, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Frederick D. Kyle appeals the order of the magistrate judge
granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directing
collection of the filing fee in accordance with the Prison
Litigation Reform Act. We have reviewed the record and the order
of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Kyle v.
Pearson, No. CA-01-360-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2001). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.