The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7542•Frederick D. Kyle v. JAMILLA F. BURNEY, Associate Warden; E. L. PERSON, Chief Warden
01-7542Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 11, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
FREDERICK D. KYLE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
No. 01-7542 JAMILLA F. BURNEY, Associate
Warden; E. L. PERSON, Chief
Warden,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-396-3)
Submitted: February 15, 2002
Decided: March 11, 2002
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
COUNSEL
Frederick D. Kyle, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Kyle, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice Kyle’s 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2001) action for failure to comply with a court order that Kyle file a
form entitled "Consent to Collection of Fees." The district court
record contains such a consent form, which Kyle executed on June
25, 2001, and filed in the district court on August 6, 2001. In light of
Kyle’s having filed the required form, we vacate the district court’s
order and remand this matter for further proceedings. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before us and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2 KYLE v. BURNEY
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.