The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7497•Willie Lewis Johnson v. JUSTICE, Captain; LIEUTENANT THOMAS; SER- GEANT BIDDIX
01-7497Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 9, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7497
WILLIE LEWIS JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
V. JUSTICE, Captain; LIEUTENANT THOMAS; SER-
GEANT BIDDIX,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-125-1-2-MU)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 9, 2002
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Lewis Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Lewis Johnson appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Johnson v. Justice, No. CA-01-125-1-2-
MU (W.D.N.C. July 11, 2001). We deny Johnson’s motion for appoint-
ment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.