Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury v. M. Knight, sued in individual capacity

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7464
MUHAMMAD ABD SALEEM EURY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
M. KNIGHT, sued in individual capacity; HILL,
sued in individual capacity; PRINCE, sued in
individual capacity; MCINTIRE; ALEXANDER, sued
in individual capacity; VICK, sued in indi-
vidual capacity; RIVERS, sued in individual
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-93-2)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 30, 2001
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2001) complaint. The court dismissed Eury’s complaint be-
cause he failed to comply with an order directing him to submit an
adequate number of copies of the complaint. Because Eury may
proceed with this action by supplying an adequate number of copies
of the complaint, the order in question is not a final, appealable
order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10
F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --