The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7463•John Cordero v. United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
01-7463Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 26, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7463
JOHN CORDERO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-01-2368-3-17-BD)
Submitted: November 9, 2001 Decided: November 26, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Cordero, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Cordero appeals from the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), in which he sought to
challenge certain orders in his criminal case. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recom-
mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Cordero v. United States Dist. Court, No. CA-01-2368-3-17-BD
(D.S.C. July 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.