The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7459•Lakeith Byron Brown v. Preutte; R. Hildebrand
01-7459Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7459
LAKEITH BYRON BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALTON BASKERVILLE; G. WASHINGTON; E. BARKS-
DALE; T. RAY; S. HILL; A. JOHNSON; E. GRAHAM;
L. CEI; S. MCNAMARA; R. BARLOW; T. NEUMAYER;
S. V. PREUTTE; R. HILDEBRAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-01-10)
Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 20, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lakeith Byorn Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lakeith Byron Brown appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Brown v. Baskerville, No. CA-01-10 (E.D. Va. June 28, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.