Robert Neil Joannides v. Russell Ginn

01-7423Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 12, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7423
ROBERT NEIL JOANNIDES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RUSSELL GINN; LARRY DAIL; ROBERT TYSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-00-58-5-BR)
Submitted: February 26, 2002 Decided: March 12, 2002
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Neil Joannides, Appellant Pro Se. Buren Riley Shields, III,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Neil Joannides appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers-
ible error. Further, Joannides’ claims regarding his untimely
submission of affidavits, and allegations of bias on the part of
the magistrate judge are meritless. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Joannides v. Ginn, No. CA-00-
58-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.