The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7412•United States of America v. Stanley Asher Cole, a/k/a Oscar Ivan Cole
01-7412Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 12, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7412
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
STANLEY ASHER COLE, a/k/a Oscar Ivan Cole,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-87-139-JFM, CA-01-1907-JFM)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Asher Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Matthew Schenning,
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stanley Asher Cole appeals the district court’s orders denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and de-
nying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Cole, Nos. CR-87-139-JFM; CA-01-1907-JFM (D. Md. Jul. 10, 2001 &
Aug. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.