William A. Veney v. RONALD ANGELONE, Director

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7387
WILLIAM A. VENEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RONALD ANGELONE, Director,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-01-6-3)
Submitted: January 18, 2002 Decided: February 7, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Veney, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William A. Veney appeals the district court’s dismissal of his
petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. §
2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). He alleges the district court erred
by failing to appoint counsel to assist him and failing to liber-
ally construe his pro se § 2254 petition. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. See Murray v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1, 7-8 (1989); Beaudett
v. City of Hampton, 775 F.2d 1274 (4th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --