The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7333•United States of America v. Scott Anthony Martin, a/k/a Patsy Martin
01-7333Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 10, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7333
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SCOTT ANTHONY MARTIN, a/k/a Patsy Martin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.
(CR-00-82)
Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott Anthony Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Scott Anthony Martin appeals from the district court’s order
denying his request for preparation of transcripts at government
expense in order to prepare a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martin, No. CR-
00-82 (E.D. Va. filed July 13, 2001; entered July 16, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.