The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7312•United States of America v. Alphonso A. Wright
01-7312Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 2, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7312
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ALPHONSO A. WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-91-35-ST-MU, CA-01-17-1-5-MU)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alphonso A. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Alphonso A. Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing his
motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-91-35-ST-MU; CA-01-17-1-5-
MU (W.D.N.C. May 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.