The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7305•United States of America v. Elray Rogers, a/k/a Elray Rodgers
01-7305Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 2, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7305
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ELRAY ROGERS, a/k/a Elray Rodgers,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CR-95-115, CA-98-633-2)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 2, 2002
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elray Rogers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elray Rogers seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (1994), that the
district court properly construed as a motion filed under 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). Because Rogers failed to obtain
authorization from this court to file a successive § 2255 motion,
the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion. 28
U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. United States
v. Rogers, Nos. CR-95-115; CA-98-633-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 25,
2001; entered June 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.