The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7211•United States of America v. Randy Chester Parsons
01-7211Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 21, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7211
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RANDY CHESTER PARSONS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CR-95-77-BO)
Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 21, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy Chester Parsons, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Randy Chester Parsons appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm the court’s order based upon the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Parsons, No. CR-95-77-BO (E.D.N.C.
May 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.