The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7150•Calvin Pressley v. OFFICER FLOYD, 7/3 Shift
01-7150Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7150
CALVIN PRESSLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER FLOYD, 7/3 Shift; THOMAS R. CORCORAN,
Warden, Maryland Correctional Adjustment
Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-
2811-L)
Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: December 28, 2001
Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Pressley, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN-
ERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Pressley appeals the district court’s order granting
the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying relief on his 42
U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Pressley v. Floyd, No. CA-00-2811-L (D. Md. May 25,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.