The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7140•Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury v. Alan Morris
01-7140Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 5, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7140
MUHAMMAD ABD SALEEM EURY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALAN MORRIS; PAUL CUMMINGS; KESHA FOWLKES;
JAMES KEELING; DANIEL BRAXTON, Warden; ROBERT
R. DOUMAR, Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-01-436-2)
Submitted: August 23, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Eury v. Morris, No. CA-01-436-2 (E.D. Va. July 3,
2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.