Charles Terrence Barlow v. Stephen M. Dewalt

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7134
CHARLES TERRENCE BARLOW,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STEPHEN M. DEWALT,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-401-5-BR)
Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 6, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Terrence Barlow, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Terrence Barlow appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition without prej-
udice, which the court properly construed as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barlow v.
Dewalt, No. CA-01-401-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed June 12, 2001; entered
June 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --