The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7089•Phillip Mann v. DONNA MAINE, Director of Medical
01-7089Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 21, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7089
PHILLIP MANN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONNA MAINE, Director of Medical; MR. LABORDE,
Corporal/Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MR. BRACKENDALE, Supervisor/Medical,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-165-2)
Submitted: December 7, 2001 Decided: December 21, 2001
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Phillip Mann, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Brandt, James R. Parrish,
BRANDT, JENNINGS, ROBERTS, DAVIS & SNEE, Falls Church, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Phillip Mann appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Mann v. Maine, No. CA-00-165-2 (E.D. Va. June 11,
2001). Furthermore, we deny Mann’s motion to compel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.