The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-7072•United States of America v. Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr
01-7072Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 12, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7072
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LAUREN ANTHONY WATSON, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-97-262, CA-01-2115-8-20)
Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. E. Jean Howard,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 2001) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Watson, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-01-2115-8-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2001;
filed June 14, 2001, entered June 18, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.